NightLiveGreat

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, July 12, 2012

I Get It, but How Do I Change My Boss' Behavior?

Posted on 9:40 AM by Unknown
Often, when I'm working with emerging leaders or high potentials in an organization, I hear them say something like the following:  "I get what you are saying about encouraging subordinates to speak up and express dissent.  However, I can't change the culture/climate on my own.  My boss isn't here.  He or she needs to change too.  What do I do to influence their behavior?"  It's a great question!  Let me offer a few thoughts:

1.  First, focus on what you can control, rather than worry about what is beyond your control.  Change the way you lead your team.  If all of you in this program begin to do that, you will begin to shift the organizational climate.  You will serve as exemplars for those that work for you. 

2.  Use questions as your tool for opening up more dialogue in meetings led by your boss.  Rather than confronting your boss about the fact that he or she may not be encouraging people to speak up, try asking some non-threatening questions in team meetings that encourage others to share information or views that have not been disclosed previously. 

3.  Use one-on-one meetings to convey to your boss that he or she may not have heard all views in a key team meeting.  Let them know, with specifics, how certain concerns are not being surfaced (without naming names!). 

4.  Invite your boss to sit in on a meeting you are leading with your team, and showcase some techniques that you and your team use to cultivate productive debate and candid dialogue. 

5.  When you read about a company that stumbled because senior executives were unaware of bad news until it was far too late, share it with your boss.  Send the article to him or her by email.  A compelling story of another organization's failure might trigger an attempt to change behavior at your firm. 
Read More
Posted in candid dialogue, leadership, team dynamics | No comments

On-Demand Ice Cream Trucks?

Posted on 9:31 AM by Unknown
Please don't tell my kids about this service!

Read More
Posted in Uber | No comments

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

The Two-Pizza Rule! How To Make Your Teams More Effective

Posted on 10:47 AM by Unknown
Source: Forbes.com
At the Forbes website, David Williams recently published an interview with Brad Smith, CEO of Intuit.  The interview focuses on the entrepreneurial skills required to lead a successful firm of any size or scope.   Here is one excerpt that I found fascinating:

David: How does being an entrepreneur at the helm of a very large enterprise differ from entrepreneurial leadership of a small startup or growth company?

Brad: Regardless of whether you are leading a large enterprise or a small team, you need to remove barriers to innovation and get out of the way. At Intuit, we operate like a company of startups. We create and foster a culture where our nearly 8,000 employees worldwide have the courage to take risks and grow by learning from success and failure. Idea Jams and unstructured time give passionate employees opportunities to collaborate on new ideas to solve customer problems. To keep ideas moving and teams nimble, we embrace the “Two-Pizza rule,” making sure product development teams are no larger than two pizzas can feed.

I absolutely LOVE the two-pizza rule.   If everyone eats 2 slices of pizza, then we are talking about an eight-person team.  That sounds just about right for me.  I constantly find organizations building teams that are far too large to be effective at accomplishing a creative task.  The two-pizza rule provides a simple heuristic for helping leaders keep their teams small and nimble.  Every organization should consider embracing this powerful rule of thumb.  
Read More
Posted in groups, leadership, team dynamics | No comments

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Time Management: Interesting New Finding

Posted on 5:30 AM by Unknown
Knowledge at Wharton features the research of Wharton Professor Cassie Mogilner and her colleagues, Harvard business professor Michael J. Norton and Yale postdoctoral associate Zoe Chance. Through a series of experimental studies, they find that, "by taking time to help others, we can help ourselves by creating a feeling of expanded time." In other words, perhaps we should reconsider when we feel stressed and reject invitations to help someone else out at work, at church, or in our neighborhood. The scholars found that "although people's objective amount of time cannot be increased (there are only 24 hours in a day) ... spending time on others increases feelings of time affluence. The impact of giving time on feelings of time affluence is driven by a boosted sense of self-efficacy -- such that giving time makes people more willing to commit to future engagements despite their busy schedules."

While I find the work compelling, I think we should take great care acting on the conclusions. We might feel better if we help others, but we also have to remember that trade-offs exist. There is no free lunch. Will our effectiveness at all activities suffer if we take on too many tasks? Many students, for instance, struggle with time management in their early years in college. While taking on extracurriculars has many benefits, I have definitely seen many students become stretched too thin. Not only does schoolwork suffer, but their effectiveness in their social or community service work tails off as well.
Read More
Posted in Time management | No comments

Monday, July 9, 2012

Vertical Integration at Lenovo vs. Outsourcing at Rivals

Posted on 9:04 AM by Unknown
The Wall Street Journal has an article today about Lenovo's vertical integration strategy.  That strategy stands in stark contrast to many of the firm's rivals in the computer business (including Apple), which have outsourced many aspects of the manufacturing process.   Lenovo CEO says, "Selling PCs is like selling fresh fruit.  The speed of innovation is very fast, so you must know how to keep up with the pace, control inventory, to match supply with demand and handle very fast turnover."  Lenovo's SVP of supply chain says, "Three years ago the whole industry was saying everyone should outsource, that's the future.  [We] came to the conclusion that even though all our other competitors are going in the other direction…we can move faster if we're more vertically integrated." 

I'm surprised by the comments, and frankly, by the strategy.   Most people would agree that Apple is one of the most innovative and highly differentiated companies in the computer industry.  If Apple can achieve that type of rapid innovation without being completely vertically integrated, then why can't Lenovo?  Apple pursues vertical integration on selected components, most importantly on its operating system.  However, Apple does not keep all manufacturing in-house.   Lenovo chooses to use outsiders for its operating system (Microsoft Windows for its PCs and Google's Android for its new tablets).    Yet, Lenovo is manufacturing many hardware components in-house.   Time will tell if the strategy will pay off.   One wonders if the path to successful innovation, though, has more to do with company culture, leadership, and new product development processes, rather than with the extent of vertical integration. 

Read More
Posted in apple, Lenovo, strategy, vertical integration | No comments

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Clear Roles: Crucial To Team Success

Posted on 5:58 AM by Unknown
Tammy Erickson writes at HBR about her research on teams at the BBC, Reuters, and elsewhere.   She argues that leaders should take great care to clearly define individual roles on a team, while leaving the approach to achieving the team's goals more ill-defined.  Why?   According to Erickson,

"Collaboration improves when the roles of individual team members are clearly defined and well understood — in fact, when individuals feel their role is bounded in ways that allow them to do a significant portion of their work independently. Without such clarity, team members are likely to waste energy negotiating roles or protecting turf, rather than focusing on the task." 

Erickson also finds that a little less clarity or definition on the path to achieving the team's goals can be beneficial.  Why?  Individuals perceive the task as something requiring them to be creative, and they feel empowered to provide their input as how to achieve the team's objectives.   In other words, define the shared goal very clearly, but give the team members some freedom to figure out the best way to get there. 
Read More
Posted in collaboration, leadership, teams | No comments

Monday, July 2, 2012

Feeling Guilty About a Mistake? Is it a Sign of Leadership Potential?

Posted on 6:47 AM by Unknown
Stanford Professor Francis Flynn and doctoral student Becky Schaumberg have conducted an interesting new study about leadership.    They administered a personality test to groups of 4-5 people.  The test examined guilt proneness, shame proneness, extraversion, and other traits.  They were particularly interested in the distinction between guilt and shame.   Feeling guilty means that someone "feels bad about a specific mistake and wants to make amends."  Feeling shame means that someone "feels bad about himself or herself and shrinks away from the error."

In this experiment, the groups had to perform two tasks after completing the personality inventory.   The subjects evaluated each others' leadership qualities after completing these tasks.  It turns out that the people who scored highest on the "guilt proneness" measure tended to be identified as the strongest leaders.  In fact, guilt proneness "predicted emerging leadership even more than extraversion."  According to Schaumberg, "Guilt-prone people tend to carry a strong sense of responsibility to others, and that responsibility makes other people see them as leaders."  

Well... I guess I may have some leadership potential... after all, I'm Catholic, and we are experts at feeling guilty!   Seriously, though, I think the study points to something very important.  Feeling a responsibility to others is the mark of a good leader.  Moreover, wanting to atone for your mistakes, rather than simply trying to cover them up, makes for an effective leader.   I wonder how we might look for those characteristics as we interview young people for leadership positions early in their careers.  Thoughts? 


Read More
Posted in guilt, leadership, personality, shame | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer
    Here's a fun video that we produced to introduce readers to the new edition of my book, Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answ...
  • The Invisible Gorilla
    Many of you have seen the video posted below.    The exercise is simple.    You ask people to count the number of passes made by people in w...
  • Project Management Podcast
    Andy Kaufman interviewed me recently for his terrific People and Projects Podcast series.   Andy's expertise lies in the field of projec...
  • Employee Recognition: The Yum Brands Way
    Fortune has a feature article this week about David Novak, the CEO of Yum Brands.  The article focuses on the leadership development effort...
  • Traveling Interationally vs. Living Overseas
    Many universities now urge or even require their students to travel internationally as part of their education.  In some instances, students...
  • Incentives for Crowdsourcing
    The Boston Globe reported Sunday on an interesting new Chinese study about crowd sourcing. Professors Zhang and Zhu examined the behavior o...
  • Hiring Unqualified Candidates: Why Do We Make That Mistake?
    Samuel A. Swift and Don A. Moore of the University of California at Berkeley, Zachariah S. Sharek of Carnegie Mellon University, and and F...
  • Business Plans: useful or not?
    Over the past few years, we have heard a great deal of conversation about the inadequacy of traditional business plans.   The lean start-up ...
  • Stop the Charade!
    I continue to be amazed at how many executives get themselves into trouble with their teams by engaging in what my friend and colleague Mich...
  • Are Network Effects Over-rated?
    Nir Eyal and Sangeet Paul Choudary have written an absolutely terrific column for TechCrunch about network effects.  The essay is titled, ...

Categories

  • 3M (1)
  • AARs (1)
  • Abrashoff (1)
  • Accountability (2)
  • acquisitions (10)
  • activist investors (1)
  • admissions (1)
  • advertising (13)
  • advice (1)
  • after-action reviews (1)
  • aging (1)
  • airlines (1)
  • algorithms (2)
  • alignment (1)
  • altruism (1)
  • Amazon (9)
  • ambition (2)
  • American Airlines (1)
  • Amy's Baking Company (1)
  • analysis paralysis (1)
  • analytics (4)
  • Android (1)
  • Andy Kaufman (1)
  • Anheuser Busch Inbev (1)
  • animation (1)
  • anxiety (2)
  • apology (3)
  • apple (8)
  • apps (1)
  • Asch (1)
  • associational thinking (1)
  • Audi (1)
  • auteur (1)
  • authenticity (2)
  • auto industry (1)
  • Avon (1)
  • Baba Shiv (1)
  • bad news (2)
  • bailout (1)
  • bankruptcy (4)
  • Banks (1)
  • Barnes and Noble (1)
  • baseball (1)
  • beer (1)
  • beer industry (1)
  • Ben and Jerry's (1)
  • Bergdorf Goodman (1)
  • Berger (1)
  • Berkun (1)
  • Best Buy (2)
  • Bezos (2)
  • big data (4)
  • Black Friday (2)
  • blades (1)
  • BMW (1)
  • Boards (1)
  • boards of directors (4)
  • bonuses (1)
  • book (1)
  • books (1)
  • BOPS (1)
  • bourbon (1)
  • BP (2)
  • brain research (1)
  • brainstorming (9)
  • brainteasers (1)
  • brand (3)
  • brand dilution (2)
  • brand equity (3)
  • brand extensions (1)
  • branding (4)
  • brands (4)
  • break-up (3)
  • breakup value analysis (1)
  • Brené Brown (1)
  • Bryant University (1)
  • budget (1)
  • Budweiser (1)
  • Build-A-Bear (1)
  • Burger King (1)
  • business class (1)
  • business model (1)
  • business models (1)
  • business plans (1)
  • business school (1)
  • Cadillac (1)
  • CAFE (1)
  • Cain (1)
  • candid dialogue (1)
  • candy (1)
  • careers (3)
  • Carlyle (1)
  • Carnival (1)
  • cash cows (1)
  • cash flows (2)
  • celebrities (1)
  • CEO compensation (3)
  • CEOs (4)
  • Challenger (1)
  • change (3)
  • characters (1)
  • charisma (1)
  • cheating (1)
  • Chevron (1)
  • China (2)
  • chocolate (2)
  • choice (4)
  • Chris Stevens (1)
  • Christensen (2)
  • clutch (1)
  • co-founders (1)
  • coaching (2)
  • Coca-Cola (1)
  • coffee (1)
  • cognitive bias (5)
  • cognitive skills (1)
  • Coke (2)
  • collaboration (4)
  • college (4)
  • college athletics (1)
  • colleges (1)
  • Columbia (1)
  • commencement (1)
  • commencement speech (1)
  • communication (4)
  • compensation (9)
  • competency models (1)
  • competition (2)
  • competitive positioning (1)
  • competitiveness (1)
  • computers (1)
  • concerts (1)
  • conflict (4)
  • conflict management (1)
  • conformity (1)
  • conglomerate (1)
  • conglomerates (2)
  • consumer behavior (3)
  • continuous improvement (1)
  • controversy (1)
  • cooperation (1)
  • core business (1)
  • corporate governance (4)
  • corporate jets (1)
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
  • corporate strategy (1)
  • counterfactual thinking (1)
  • creativity (25)
  • crisis management (1)
  • critical ability (1)
  • CRM (1)
  • crowdsourcing (5)
  • cruise (1)
  • cultural differences (2)
  • culture (6)
  • customer experience (2)
  • customer satisfaction (2)
  • customer service (6)
  • Dan Heath (1)
  • Daniel Pink (1)
  • David Burkus (1)
  • debt (1)
  • deciision making (1)
  • decision making (17)
  • decision-making (15)
  • Deepwater Horizon (1)
  • deliberate practice (1)
  • Delta (1)
  • design (4)
  • design thinking (3)
  • devil's advocate (1)
  • Diapers.com (1)
  • directors (1)
  • dishonesty (1)
  • Disney (3)
  • disruptive technology (8)
  • dissent (4)
  • diversification (7)
  • divestiture (1)
  • dividends (1)
  • Dollar Shave Club (1)
  • doodling (1)
  • Dove (1)
  • Dr. Woody (1)
  • Ducati (1)
  • Duhigg (1)
  • earnings forecasts (1)
  • ecommerce (3)
  • economic growth (1)
  • economies of scale (5)
  • Edmondson (1)
  • education (3)
  • Eisenhower (1)
  • Eisner (1)
  • Electronic Arts (1)
  • email (1)
  • emerging markets (3)
  • emotions (1)
  • employee engagement (4)
  • employee recognition (1)
  • employees (1)
  • empowerment (1)
  • endorsements (1)
  • endowment effect (1)
  • Engagement (2)
  • entertainment (1)
  • entrepreneurship (11)
  • entrerpreneurship (1)
  • ESPN (3)
  • ethics (3)
  • ethnography (1)
  • Etsy (1)
  • European debt crisis (1)
  • Everest (2)
  • evolution (1)
  • execution (1)
  • exercise (1)
  • exit interviews (1)
  • experimentation (4)
  • expertise dissensus (1)
  • experts (1)
  • Facebook (5)
  • faculty (1)
  • Fadell (1)
  • failure (5)
  • Failures (3)
  • fair process (1)
  • Fastenal (1)
  • feedback (1)
  • female leaders (1)
  • filtering (1)
  • financial statements (1)
  • first mover advantage (1)
  • flattery (1)
  • flocking (1)
  • focus groups (1)
  • Ford (3)
  • freemium (2)
  • Friendly's (1)
  • fuel economy (1)
  • furniture (1)
  • Gallup (1)
  • game theory (3)
  • games (1)
  • gaming (1)
  • Gap (1)
  • gatekeepers (1)
  • GE (1)
  • gender bias (2)
  • gender differences (1)
  • Gillette (1)
  • Gilt Groupe (1)
  • global (1)
  • globalization (2)
  • GM (1)
  • goals (2)
  • Goodreads (1)
  • Google (6)
  • gossip (1)
  • governance (5)
  • graduates (1)
  • graphic facilitators (1)
  • Great Courses (2)
  • grit (1)
  • grocery (1)
  • ground rules (1)
  • group dynamics (9)
  • Groupon (1)
  • groups (4)
  • groupthink (3)
  • growth (3)
  • guilt (1)
  • Hackman (1)
  • Halvorson (1)
  • happiness (1)
  • Hasbro (1)
  • HBS (1)
  • health care (2)
  • Heath brothers (1)
  • Henry Stewart Talks (1)
  • heuristics (1)
  • hierarchy (2)
  • high achievers (1)
  • higher education (2)
  • Hilton (1)
  • hiring (6)
  • Home Depot (1)
  • Homeboy Industries (1)
  • Honda (1)
  • House of cards (1)
  • HP (4)
  • HR (1)
  • human resources (27)
  • Iams (2)
  • IBM (1)
  • ice cream (1)
  • IDEA (1)
  • IDEO (1)
  • Iger (1)
  • IKEA (1)
  • Improv (2)
  • inattentional blindness (1)
  • incentives (5)
  • India (1)
  • industrial policy (1)
  • industry structure (2)
  • inflation (1)
  • influence (1)
  • information overload (1)
  • Information sharing (2)
  • innovation (40)
  • Instagram (2)
  • insurance (1)
  • intellectual property (1)
  • international (1)
  • internet (2)
  • internet privacy (1)
  • interviews (6)
  • intrinsic motivation (1)
  • introverts (2)
  • Intuit (1)
  • intuition (1)
  • investors (2)
  • invisible gorilla (1)
  • IPO (3)
  • iPod (1)
  • IRS (1)
  • Isaacson (1)
  • Iyengar (1)
  • J.C. Penney (3)
  • Japan (5)
  • JC Penney (3)
  • JetBlue (1)
  • Jimmy Kimmel (1)
  • Job interviews (1)
  • job search (1)
  • Jobs (6)
  • Johnnie Walker (1)
  • joint ventures (1)
  • Jon Stewart (1)
  • Keith Sawyer (1)
  • Keurig (1)
  • Kindle (1)
  • Kodak (1)
  • Korea (1)
  • Kraft (1)
  • labor markets (1)
  • Lady Gaga (1)
  • Lafley (1)
  • Lampert (1)
  • LDRLB (1)
  • leadership (80)
  • leadership development (12)
  • leadership transitions (1)
  • lean startup (2)
  • learning (7)
  • Lego (1)
  • Lenovo (2)
  • lifetime value of a customer (1)
  • Lincoln (1)
  • Little Bets (1)
  • Loeb (1)
  • logistics (1)
  • lone genius (1)
  • Long Tail (1)
  • loss aversion (1)
  • LTV (1)
  • Lululemon (1)
  • Maker's Mark (1)
  • management by walking around (1)
  • manufacturing (1)
  • marginal cost (1)
  • market research (2)
  • market share (1)
  • marketing (22)
  • marketing research (1)
  • marketing to children (1)
  • Marriott (1)
  • Mattel (1)
  • MBWA (1)
  • McDonald (1)
  • McDonald's (1)
  • McKinsey (1)
  • media (2)
  • meetings (3)
  • Memorial Day (1)
  • mentorship (2)
  • mergers (4)
  • metrics (2)
  • Michael Porter (1)
  • Michigan Fish Test (1)
  • Microsoft (1)
  • Microsoft Surface (1)
  • military (1)
  • milkshake test (1)
  • millenials (1)
  • mission (1)
  • mistake (1)
  • mistakes (2)
  • mobile (2)
  • Monster (1)
  • Montgomery (1)
  • moral behavior (1)
  • moral standards (1)
  • motivation (7)
  • motorcycles (1)
  • Motorola (1)
  • movies (1)
  • Mulally (1)
  • Mullaly (1)
  • multinationals (1)
  • multitasking (1)
  • Murdoch (1)
  • music (1)
  • Myth of the Garage (1)
  • narcissism (3)
  • narratives (1)
  • NASA (2)
  • Navy (1)
  • NCAA (1)
  • negotiation (1)
  • negotiations (1)
  • Net Promoter Score (1)
  • NetFlix (7)
  • network effects (2)
  • neuroscience (1)
  • new groupthink (1)
  • New manager (1)
  • New product development (1)
  • News Corp (1)
  • NFL (1)
  • Nike (1)
  • noble profession (1)
  • Nokia (1)
  • non-compete agreements (1)
  • Nook (1)
  • Nordstrom (1)
  • Nutella (1)
  • observation (2)
  • off-price retail (1)
  • Office Depot (1)
  • office supplies (1)
  • OfficeMax (1)
  • oil (1)
  • oil industry (1)
  • oil spill (2)
  • Old Milwaukee (1)
  • Olympics (3)
  • online dating (1)
  • online marketplace (1)
  • online shopping (1)
  • Orbis (1)
  • Oreo (1)
  • organic growth (1)
  • organization structure (1)
  • organizational structure (2)
  • overconfidence (1)
  • packaging (1)
  • Paul Levy (1)
  • PC (1)
  • Pepsi (2)
  • performance evaluation (3)
  • peripheral knowledge (1)
  • personal brand (1)
  • personality (2)
  • personalization (1)
  • persuasion (2)
  • Piskorski (1)
  • Pixar (2)
  • Planet Fitness (1)
  • politics (1)
  • Postal Service (2)
  • power (2)
  • Power of Habit (1)
  • Powerpoint (1)
  • premium (1)
  • presentations (3)
  • prevention focus (1)
  • price (1)
  • pricing (6)
  • pricing strategy (1)
  • private equity (2)
  • private label (1)
  • problem finding (2)
  • problem solving (1)
  • problem-finding (2)
  • process losses (1)
  • processes (1)
  • Proctor and Gamble (6)
  • product design (1)
  • productivity (3)
  • professors (1)
  • project management (1)
  • promotion (1)
  • promotion focus (1)
  • promotions (1)
  • protege effect (2)
  • prototypes (2)
  • psychology (1)
  • public relations (3)
  • public speaking (4)
  • purpose (1)
  • quality (3)
  • questions (2)
  • Qwikster (3)
  • Rasmussen (1)
  • razors (1)
  • reality TV (1)
  • reasoning (1)
  • recessions (1)
  • recognition (2)
  • recommendations (1)
  • Red Cross (1)
  • Redbox (1)
  • reference checks (1)
  • reflection (1)
  • regulation (1)
  • reputation (1)
  • research (3)
  • Research and development (1)
  • resource allocation (1)
  • restaurants (1)
  • retail (29)
  • retailers (1)
  • retention (3)
  • reviews (1)
  • rewards (2)
  • Richard Branson (1)
  • risk (7)
  • risk-taking (2)
  • rock and roll (1)
  • Ron Johnson (1)
  • rules of thumb (1)
  • safety (2)
  • salary negotiations (1)
  • Saturday Night Live (2)
  • scandal (1)
  • scarcity (1)
  • Schulze (1)
  • search (1)
  • Sears (4)
  • SEC reporting (1)
  • See's Candies (1)
  • self-confidence (1)
  • self-control (1)
  • serendipity (1)
  • serotonin (1)
  • severance (1)
  • shame (1)
  • Sharknado (1)
  • shopping (1)
  • simulation (2)
  • Skanska (1)
  • Skechers (1)
  • small business (1)
  • small wins (1)
  • smartphones (2)
  • SNL (3)
  • Snooth (1)
  • Snowe (1)
  • social currency (1)
  • social enterprise (1)
  • social gaming (1)
  • social influence (2)
  • social media (14)
  • social networks (1)
  • soda (1)
  • solar power (1)
  • Solyndra (1)
  • Sony (1)
  • speaking up (2)
  • speed (1)
  • spinoff (1)
  • spinoffs (1)
  • sports radio (1)
  • Stand-up Economist (1)
  • Stanford (1)
  • Staples (2)
  • Starbucks (6)
  • start-ups (1)
  • startups (6)
  • status (3)
  • Steelcase (1)
  • Steve Jobs (2)
  • stock options (1)
  • stories (1)
  • storytelling (1)
  • strategic planning (1)
  • strategy (41)
  • stress (2)
  • substitutes (1)
  • succession (5)
  • supermarkets (1)
  • supply chain (1)
  • surveys (1)
  • Susan Cain (2)
  • switching costs (1)
  • synergies (2)
  • synergy (1)
  • talent (2)
  • talent management (9)
  • talent retention (1)
  • Target (3)
  • target market (1)
  • taste test (1)
  • teaching (3)
  • team dynamics (9)
  • team scaffolds (1)
  • teaming (1)
  • teams (24)
  • technology (2)
  • TED (2)
  • telecommuting (1)
  • television (1)
  • tennis (1)
  • test (1)
  • Thanksgiving (1)
  • The Daily Show (1)
  • Ticketmaster (1)
  • Time management (2)
  • Timothy Judge (1)
  • Tina Fey (1)
  • TJX (1)
  • top management teams (2)
  • Toyota (1)
  • toys (2)
  • tradeoffs (2)
  • transaction costs (1)
  • Triumph (1)
  • trust (1)
  • tuition (1)
  • tuition bubble (1)
  • turnaround (2)
  • turnover (1)
  • TV (2)
  • Twitter (5)
  • Tyco (1)
  • Uber (1)
  • Unbroken (1)
  • uncertainty (1)
  • Uniqlo (1)
  • universities (3)
  • university (1)
  • Unlocking the Truth (1)
  • unrelated diversification (1)
  • user-generated content (1)
  • USS Greeneville (1)
  • vacation (1)
  • valuation (1)
  • Values (2)
  • venture capital (1)
  • vertical integration (7)
  • video games (3)
  • Vine (1)
  • VIPs (1)
  • viral (1)
  • viral marketing (1)
  • Virgin Atlantic (1)
  • virtual teams (1)
  • vision (2)
  • volatility (1)
  • Vosques Haut-Chocolat (1)
  • wait times (1)
  • Wal-Mart (1)
  • Warren Buffett (2)
  • Washington Post (1)
  • Wharton (1)
  • Whitman (1)
  • Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes For an Answer (2)
  • Will Ferrell (1)
  • wine (2)
  • wisdom of crowds (1)
  • work (2)
  • work ethic (1)
  • workspace (1)
  • Yahoo (1)
  • Yelp (1)
  • Yum Brands (2)
  • Zamperini (1)
  • Zuckerman (1)
  • Zynga (2)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (126)
    • ▼  August (7)
      • Project Management Podcast
      • Budweiser: Can It Go Global?
      • Break Up the Washington Post Corporation
      • Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes for an Answer
      • Employee Recognition: The Yum Brands Way
      • Hiring Unqualified Candidates: Why Do We Make That...
      • The Invisible Gorilla
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2012 (219)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2011 (155)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile