NightLiveGreat

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Long Term Thinking Does Exist in Corporate America!

Posted on 8:27 AM by Unknown
Harvard Business School Assistant Professor George Serafeim, HBS doctoral candidate Maria Loumioti, and Assistant Professor Francois Brochet have written a new paper titled, Short-termism, Investor Clientele, and Firm Risk.  They find that companies with a short-run orientation do have more volatile stock returns and a higher cost of capital.   On the other hand, they find that we may be over-estimating the amount of short term thinking out there in corporate America.   The scholars find plenty of firms who are taking a long term perspective.   Here's an excerpt from HBS Working Knowledge's interview with the authors:

Q: In general, what relationship did you find between companies you identified as short-term-oriented, their investors, and the behavior of their stocks?

Francois Brochet: Overall, we found a positive association between the horizon over which firms communicate and the investment horizon of their shareholders. In addition, short-term-oriented firms appear to have more volatile stock returns and higher estimated cost of equity capital—that is, greater risk. While the presence of long-term-oriented investors appears to mitigate the positive association between firms' short horizon and the volatility of their stock, this does not apply to the association between short-termism and cost of capital. We interpret this as evidence that our short-termism measure captures a dimension of non-diversifiable risk in the economy. 

Q: What is the big takeaway here for investors, especially those seeking to invest in companies with longer-term perspectives?

George Serafeim: One important takeaway is that firms with long-term horizons exist! We tend to make sweeping statements and overgeneralize. While significant short-termism exists, there are organizations that have developed a long-term-oriented approach through formal (e.g., incentive systems) or informal institutions (e.g., building the corporate culture over time and employee selection).
The finding that more long-term-oriented firms have lower volatility and cost of capital has implications for capital allocation. Investors who care about the volatility of their portfolio should factor in their decisions the time horizon of the corporation. That generates a need for more data that help investors separate companies that are short-term-oriented versus long-term-oriented. Developing a robust data infrastructure that separates companies could have profound implications and incentivize companies to become more long-term-oriented.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in investors, leadership, risk, volatility | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Understanding Cultural Differences: The Michigan Fish Test
    Check out this image. What do you see?    Source:  Richard Nisbett via CNN.com In this article for CNN, Columbia Professor Sheena Iyengar d...
  • I Get It, but How Do I Change My Boss' Behavior?
    Often, when I'm working with emerging leaders or high potentials in an organization, I hear them say something like the following:  ...
  • Fewer Startups in Japan: Lessons for all Nations
    I'm here teaching in Tokyo for a week, as I have each July for the past decade.   Therefore, I thought it would be appropriate to offer ...
  • Curing CEO Disease
    The Wall Street Journal's Joann Lublin wrote a terrific column this week about "CEO disease."   Specifically, she writes about...
  • Are Network Effects Over-rated?
    Nir Eyal and Sangeet Paul Choudary have written an absolutely terrific column for TechCrunch about network effects.  The essay is titled, ...
  • The Protege Effect
    Fast Company's Drake Baer has a new column titled, "Why Teaching Makes You Smarter."   In the article, he draws upon a terrif...
  • Are People More Cooperative When They Make Speedy, Intuitive Choices?
    David Rand, Joshua Greene, and Martin Nowak have conducted a series of interesting new experiments that show a correlation between decisio...
  • The Dollar Shave Club: Look Out Gillette?
    The Wall Street Journal reports today about the rapid and surprising emergence of a new competitor to Gillette in the razor and blades busi...
  • Should Pepsi Divest Frito Lay?
    As many of my readers know, I am often skeptical of diversification strategies. I prefer focused firms that place their undivided attention...
  • The Power of Grit
    Paul Tough has written a thought-provoking new book titled, How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity, and the Hidden Power of Character .  Tou...

Categories

  • 3M (1)
  • AARs (1)
  • Abrashoff (1)
  • Accountability (2)
  • acquisitions (10)
  • activist investors (1)
  • admissions (1)
  • advertising (13)
  • advice (1)
  • after-action reviews (1)
  • aging (1)
  • airlines (1)
  • algorithms (2)
  • alignment (1)
  • altruism (1)
  • Amazon (9)
  • ambition (2)
  • American Airlines (1)
  • Amy's Baking Company (1)
  • analysis paralysis (1)
  • analytics (4)
  • Android (1)
  • Andy Kaufman (1)
  • Anheuser Busch Inbev (1)
  • animation (1)
  • anxiety (2)
  • apology (3)
  • apple (8)
  • apps (1)
  • Asch (1)
  • associational thinking (1)
  • Audi (1)
  • auteur (1)
  • authenticity (2)
  • auto industry (1)
  • Avon (1)
  • Baba Shiv (1)
  • bad news (2)
  • bailout (1)
  • bankruptcy (4)
  • Banks (1)
  • Barnes and Noble (1)
  • baseball (1)
  • beer (1)
  • beer industry (1)
  • Ben and Jerry's (1)
  • Bergdorf Goodman (1)
  • Berger (1)
  • Berkun (1)
  • Best Buy (2)
  • Bezos (2)
  • big data (4)
  • Black Friday (2)
  • blades (1)
  • BMW (1)
  • Boards (1)
  • boards of directors (4)
  • bonuses (1)
  • book (1)
  • books (1)
  • BOPS (1)
  • bourbon (1)
  • BP (2)
  • brain research (1)
  • brainstorming (9)
  • brainteasers (1)
  • brand (3)
  • brand dilution (2)
  • brand equity (3)
  • brand extensions (1)
  • branding (4)
  • brands (4)
  • break-up (3)
  • breakup value analysis (1)
  • BrenĂ© Brown (1)
  • Bryant University (1)
  • budget (1)
  • Budweiser (1)
  • Build-A-Bear (1)
  • Burger King (1)
  • business class (1)
  • business model (1)
  • business models (1)
  • business plans (1)
  • business school (1)
  • Cadillac (1)
  • CAFE (1)
  • Cain (1)
  • candid dialogue (1)
  • candy (1)
  • careers (3)
  • Carlyle (1)
  • Carnival (1)
  • cash cows (1)
  • cash flows (2)
  • celebrities (1)
  • CEO compensation (3)
  • CEOs (4)
  • Challenger (1)
  • change (3)
  • characters (1)
  • charisma (1)
  • cheating (1)
  • Chevron (1)
  • China (2)
  • chocolate (2)
  • choice (4)
  • Chris Stevens (1)
  • Christensen (2)
  • clutch (1)
  • co-founders (1)
  • coaching (2)
  • Coca-Cola (1)
  • coffee (1)
  • cognitive bias (5)
  • cognitive skills (1)
  • Coke (2)
  • collaboration (4)
  • college (4)
  • college athletics (1)
  • colleges (1)
  • Columbia (1)
  • commencement (1)
  • commencement speech (1)
  • communication (4)
  • compensation (9)
  • competency models (1)
  • competition (2)
  • competitive positioning (1)
  • competitiveness (1)
  • computers (1)
  • concerts (1)
  • conflict (4)
  • conflict management (1)
  • conformity (1)
  • conglomerate (1)
  • conglomerates (2)
  • consumer behavior (3)
  • continuous improvement (1)
  • controversy (1)
  • cooperation (1)
  • core business (1)
  • corporate governance (4)
  • corporate jets (1)
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
  • corporate strategy (1)
  • counterfactual thinking (1)
  • creativity (25)
  • crisis management (1)
  • critical ability (1)
  • CRM (1)
  • crowdsourcing (5)
  • cruise (1)
  • cultural differences (2)
  • culture (6)
  • customer experience (2)
  • customer satisfaction (2)
  • customer service (6)
  • Dan Heath (1)
  • Daniel Pink (1)
  • David Burkus (1)
  • debt (1)
  • deciision making (1)
  • decision making (17)
  • decision-making (15)
  • Deepwater Horizon (1)
  • deliberate practice (1)
  • Delta (1)
  • design (4)
  • design thinking (3)
  • devil's advocate (1)
  • Diapers.com (1)
  • directors (1)
  • dishonesty (1)
  • Disney (3)
  • disruptive technology (8)
  • dissent (4)
  • diversification (7)
  • divestiture (1)
  • dividends (1)
  • Dollar Shave Club (1)
  • doodling (1)
  • Dove (1)
  • Dr. Woody (1)
  • Ducati (1)
  • Duhigg (1)
  • earnings forecasts (1)
  • ecommerce (3)
  • economic growth (1)
  • economies of scale (5)
  • Edmondson (1)
  • education (3)
  • Eisenhower (1)
  • Eisner (1)
  • Electronic Arts (1)
  • email (1)
  • emerging markets (3)
  • emotions (1)
  • employee engagement (4)
  • employee recognition (1)
  • employees (1)
  • empowerment (1)
  • endorsements (1)
  • endowment effect (1)
  • Engagement (2)
  • entertainment (1)
  • entrepreneurship (11)
  • entrerpreneurship (1)
  • ESPN (3)
  • ethics (3)
  • ethnography (1)
  • Etsy (1)
  • European debt crisis (1)
  • Everest (2)
  • evolution (1)
  • execution (1)
  • exercise (1)
  • exit interviews (1)
  • experimentation (4)
  • expertise dissensus (1)
  • experts (1)
  • Facebook (5)
  • faculty (1)
  • Fadell (1)
  • failure (5)
  • Failures (3)
  • fair process (1)
  • Fastenal (1)
  • feedback (1)
  • female leaders (1)
  • filtering (1)
  • financial statements (1)
  • first mover advantage (1)
  • flattery (1)
  • flocking (1)
  • focus groups (1)
  • Ford (3)
  • freemium (2)
  • Friendly's (1)
  • fuel economy (1)
  • furniture (1)
  • Gallup (1)
  • game theory (3)
  • games (1)
  • gaming (1)
  • Gap (1)
  • gatekeepers (1)
  • GE (1)
  • gender bias (2)
  • gender differences (1)
  • Gillette (1)
  • Gilt Groupe (1)
  • global (1)
  • globalization (2)
  • GM (1)
  • goals (2)
  • Goodreads (1)
  • Google (6)
  • gossip (1)
  • governance (5)
  • graduates (1)
  • graphic facilitators (1)
  • Great Courses (2)
  • grit (1)
  • grocery (1)
  • ground rules (1)
  • group dynamics (9)
  • Groupon (1)
  • groups (4)
  • groupthink (3)
  • growth (3)
  • guilt (1)
  • Hackman (1)
  • Halvorson (1)
  • happiness (1)
  • Hasbro (1)
  • HBS (1)
  • health care (2)
  • Heath brothers (1)
  • Henry Stewart Talks (1)
  • heuristics (1)
  • hierarchy (2)
  • high achievers (1)
  • higher education (2)
  • Hilton (1)
  • hiring (6)
  • Home Depot (1)
  • Homeboy Industries (1)
  • Honda (1)
  • House of cards (1)
  • HP (4)
  • HR (1)
  • human resources (27)
  • Iams (2)
  • IBM (1)
  • ice cream (1)
  • IDEA (1)
  • IDEO (1)
  • Iger (1)
  • IKEA (1)
  • Improv (2)
  • inattentional blindness (1)
  • incentives (5)
  • India (1)
  • industrial policy (1)
  • industry structure (2)
  • inflation (1)
  • influence (1)
  • information overload (1)
  • Information sharing (2)
  • innovation (40)
  • Instagram (2)
  • insurance (1)
  • intellectual property (1)
  • international (1)
  • internet (2)
  • internet privacy (1)
  • interviews (6)
  • intrinsic motivation (1)
  • introverts (2)
  • Intuit (1)
  • intuition (1)
  • investors (2)
  • invisible gorilla (1)
  • IPO (3)
  • iPod (1)
  • IRS (1)
  • Isaacson (1)
  • Iyengar (1)
  • J.C. Penney (3)
  • Japan (5)
  • JC Penney (3)
  • JetBlue (1)
  • Jimmy Kimmel (1)
  • Job interviews (1)
  • job search (1)
  • Jobs (6)
  • Johnnie Walker (1)
  • joint ventures (1)
  • Jon Stewart (1)
  • Keith Sawyer (1)
  • Keurig (1)
  • Kindle (1)
  • Kodak (1)
  • Korea (1)
  • Kraft (1)
  • labor markets (1)
  • Lady Gaga (1)
  • Lafley (1)
  • Lampert (1)
  • LDRLB (1)
  • leadership (80)
  • leadership development (12)
  • leadership transitions (1)
  • lean startup (2)
  • learning (7)
  • Lego (1)
  • Lenovo (2)
  • lifetime value of a customer (1)
  • Lincoln (1)
  • Little Bets (1)
  • Loeb (1)
  • logistics (1)
  • lone genius (1)
  • Long Tail (1)
  • loss aversion (1)
  • LTV (1)
  • Lululemon (1)
  • Maker's Mark (1)
  • management by walking around (1)
  • manufacturing (1)
  • marginal cost (1)
  • market research (2)
  • market share (1)
  • marketing (22)
  • marketing research (1)
  • marketing to children (1)
  • Marriott (1)
  • Mattel (1)
  • MBWA (1)
  • McDonald (1)
  • McDonald's (1)
  • McKinsey (1)
  • media (2)
  • meetings (3)
  • Memorial Day (1)
  • mentorship (2)
  • mergers (4)
  • metrics (2)
  • Michael Porter (1)
  • Michigan Fish Test (1)
  • Microsoft (1)
  • Microsoft Surface (1)
  • military (1)
  • milkshake test (1)
  • millenials (1)
  • mission (1)
  • mistake (1)
  • mistakes (2)
  • mobile (2)
  • Monster (1)
  • Montgomery (1)
  • moral behavior (1)
  • moral standards (1)
  • motivation (7)
  • motorcycles (1)
  • Motorola (1)
  • movies (1)
  • Mulally (1)
  • Mullaly (1)
  • multinationals (1)
  • multitasking (1)
  • Murdoch (1)
  • music (1)
  • Myth of the Garage (1)
  • narcissism (3)
  • narratives (1)
  • NASA (2)
  • Navy (1)
  • NCAA (1)
  • negotiation (1)
  • negotiations (1)
  • Net Promoter Score (1)
  • NetFlix (7)
  • network effects (2)
  • neuroscience (1)
  • new groupthink (1)
  • New manager (1)
  • New product development (1)
  • News Corp (1)
  • NFL (1)
  • Nike (1)
  • noble profession (1)
  • Nokia (1)
  • non-compete agreements (1)
  • Nook (1)
  • Nordstrom (1)
  • Nutella (1)
  • observation (2)
  • off-price retail (1)
  • Office Depot (1)
  • office supplies (1)
  • OfficeMax (1)
  • oil (1)
  • oil industry (1)
  • oil spill (2)
  • Old Milwaukee (1)
  • Olympics (3)
  • online dating (1)
  • online marketplace (1)
  • online shopping (1)
  • Orbis (1)
  • Oreo (1)
  • organic growth (1)
  • organization structure (1)
  • organizational structure (2)
  • overconfidence (1)
  • packaging (1)
  • Paul Levy (1)
  • PC (1)
  • Pepsi (2)
  • performance evaluation (3)
  • peripheral knowledge (1)
  • personal brand (1)
  • personality (2)
  • personalization (1)
  • persuasion (2)
  • Piskorski (1)
  • Pixar (2)
  • Planet Fitness (1)
  • politics (1)
  • Postal Service (2)
  • power (2)
  • Power of Habit (1)
  • Powerpoint (1)
  • premium (1)
  • presentations (3)
  • prevention focus (1)
  • price (1)
  • pricing (6)
  • pricing strategy (1)
  • private equity (2)
  • private label (1)
  • problem finding (2)
  • problem solving (1)
  • problem-finding (2)
  • process losses (1)
  • processes (1)
  • Proctor and Gamble (6)
  • product design (1)
  • productivity (3)
  • professors (1)
  • project management (1)
  • promotion (1)
  • promotion focus (1)
  • promotions (1)
  • protege effect (2)
  • prototypes (2)
  • psychology (1)
  • public relations (3)
  • public speaking (4)
  • purpose (1)
  • quality (3)
  • questions (2)
  • Qwikster (3)
  • Rasmussen (1)
  • razors (1)
  • reality TV (1)
  • reasoning (1)
  • recessions (1)
  • recognition (2)
  • recommendations (1)
  • Red Cross (1)
  • Redbox (1)
  • reference checks (1)
  • reflection (1)
  • regulation (1)
  • reputation (1)
  • research (3)
  • Research and development (1)
  • resource allocation (1)
  • restaurants (1)
  • retail (29)
  • retailers (1)
  • retention (3)
  • reviews (1)
  • rewards (2)
  • Richard Branson (1)
  • risk (7)
  • risk-taking (2)
  • rock and roll (1)
  • Ron Johnson (1)
  • rules of thumb (1)
  • safety (2)
  • salary negotiations (1)
  • Saturday Night Live (2)
  • scandal (1)
  • scarcity (1)
  • Schulze (1)
  • search (1)
  • Sears (4)
  • SEC reporting (1)
  • See's Candies (1)
  • self-confidence (1)
  • self-control (1)
  • serendipity (1)
  • serotonin (1)
  • severance (1)
  • shame (1)
  • Sharknado (1)
  • shopping (1)
  • simulation (2)
  • Skanska (1)
  • Skechers (1)
  • small business (1)
  • small wins (1)
  • smartphones (2)
  • SNL (3)
  • Snooth (1)
  • Snowe (1)
  • social currency (1)
  • social enterprise (1)
  • social gaming (1)
  • social influence (2)
  • social media (14)
  • social networks (1)
  • soda (1)
  • solar power (1)
  • Solyndra (1)
  • Sony (1)
  • speaking up (2)
  • speed (1)
  • spinoff (1)
  • spinoffs (1)
  • sports radio (1)
  • Stand-up Economist (1)
  • Stanford (1)
  • Staples (2)
  • Starbucks (6)
  • start-ups (1)
  • startups (6)
  • status (3)
  • Steelcase (1)
  • Steve Jobs (2)
  • stock options (1)
  • stories (1)
  • storytelling (1)
  • strategic planning (1)
  • strategy (41)
  • stress (2)
  • substitutes (1)
  • succession (5)
  • supermarkets (1)
  • supply chain (1)
  • surveys (1)
  • Susan Cain (2)
  • switching costs (1)
  • synergies (2)
  • synergy (1)
  • talent (2)
  • talent management (9)
  • talent retention (1)
  • Target (3)
  • target market (1)
  • taste test (1)
  • teaching (3)
  • team dynamics (9)
  • team scaffolds (1)
  • teaming (1)
  • teams (24)
  • technology (2)
  • TED (2)
  • telecommuting (1)
  • television (1)
  • tennis (1)
  • test (1)
  • Thanksgiving (1)
  • The Daily Show (1)
  • Ticketmaster (1)
  • Time management (2)
  • Timothy Judge (1)
  • Tina Fey (1)
  • TJX (1)
  • top management teams (2)
  • Toyota (1)
  • toys (2)
  • tradeoffs (2)
  • transaction costs (1)
  • Triumph (1)
  • trust (1)
  • tuition (1)
  • tuition bubble (1)
  • turnaround (2)
  • turnover (1)
  • TV (2)
  • Twitter (5)
  • Tyco (1)
  • Uber (1)
  • Unbroken (1)
  • uncertainty (1)
  • Uniqlo (1)
  • universities (3)
  • university (1)
  • Unlocking the Truth (1)
  • unrelated diversification (1)
  • user-generated content (1)
  • USS Greeneville (1)
  • vacation (1)
  • valuation (1)
  • Values (2)
  • venture capital (1)
  • vertical integration (7)
  • video games (3)
  • Vine (1)
  • VIPs (1)
  • viral (1)
  • viral marketing (1)
  • Virgin Atlantic (1)
  • virtual teams (1)
  • vision (2)
  • volatility (1)
  • Vosques Haut-Chocolat (1)
  • wait times (1)
  • Wal-Mart (1)
  • Warren Buffett (2)
  • Washington Post (1)
  • Wharton (1)
  • Whitman (1)
  • Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes For an Answer (2)
  • Will Ferrell (1)
  • wine (2)
  • wisdom of crowds (1)
  • work (2)
  • work ethic (1)
  • workspace (1)
  • Yahoo (1)
  • Yelp (1)
  • Yum Brands (2)
  • Zamperini (1)
  • Zuckerman (1)
  • Zynga (2)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (126)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ▼  2012 (219)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ▼  April (24)
      • Biased Samples Hike Executive Compensation
      • Is Telecommuting Effective or Not?
      • Teaming is a Verb!
      • What Every HR Exec Should be Doing
      • Does Exercise Make You More Intelligent?
      • Is Doodling Something to be Encouraged?
      • Why Humans Don't Excel at Multitasking
      • The Shops at Target
      • Do Older Entrepreneurs Have an Edge?
      • The Hottest Growth Stock of the Past 25 Years? Yo...
      • Long Term Thinking Does Exist in Corporate America!
      • Why Change is Hard
      • Facebook and Instagram: Where was the Board?
      • Audi to Acquire Ducati
      • Growth Lessons from Gilt Groupe Co-Founders
      • Separating Needs and Concepts: How to Develop Grea...
      • The Dollar Shave Club: Look Out Gillette?
      • Do Online Dating Sites Help Those Who Struggle Fin...
      • The Facebook-Instagram Deal
      • External vs. Internal Hires: The Pay-Performance Gap
      • Will Delta really save money by acquiring an oil r...
      • Can Burger King Be Saved?
      • Do You Want Your Peers to Set Your Bonus?
      • Gender Bias in Human Resource Processes: How to Ov...
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2011 (155)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile