NightLiveGreat

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The Facebook-Instagram Deal

Posted on 11:45 AM by Unknown
Wow! What else can you say?  Facebook pays $1 billion for a company with 12 employees and no revenue.   I'd love to see the discounted cash flow model that my students could come up with to determine that valuation! 

What's going on with this acquisition?  First and foremost, we have to remember that photo-sharing is a crucial element of the Facebook experience.  As my former colleague Mikolaj Jan Piskorski likes to say, Facebook made it socially acceptable for all of us to become exhibitionists and voyeurs to some degree!   In that sense, Instagram has emerged as a major threat to Facebook.  As people spend more time sharing their photos via Instagram's mobile app, they are likely to spend less time on Facebook.   That reduced time on Facebook will cost the social media heavyweight a significant amount of advertising revenue.  Moreover, rumors of a possible link-up between Twitter and Instagram (or perhaps even Google and Instagram) surely made Mark Zuckerberg more than a bit nervous.

What challenges will Facebook face with this acquisition?   Zuckerberg has announced that he intends to continue operating Instagram as an independent company with relationships to other social media platforms such as Twitter.  Users will still be able to post photos on other social media services, follower users outside of Facebook, and can choose not to share photos on the Facebook platform.   In some sense, this move is a type of vertical integration.  When that happens, firms also face the challenge of competing with their customers.  Instagram will now be competing with its customers - i.e. Twitter and Google Plus compete with Facebook.  Will that cause friction?  Will it cause Instagram competitors such as Hipstagram and PicYou to steal away users?  Facebook will have to be quite careful as it manages those relationships.

Some experts have wondered why Facebook could not have achieved some of the same benefits without having to acquire Instagram. Could they have formed an alliance or partnership with Instagram?  Perhaps they could have.  However, such an arrangement may have made it more difficult to engage in the type of close coordination required to integrate Instagram more deeply into the Facebook platform moving forward.  If Instagram simply were to remain an independent company, then an alliance might have made more sense.  However, I think more intense coordination and integration is coming... and a merger probably makes more sense in that instance. 

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in acquisitions, Facebook, Instagram, social media | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Understanding Cultural Differences: The Michigan Fish Test
    Check out this image. What do you see?    Source:  Richard Nisbett via CNN.com In this article for CNN, Columbia Professor Sheena Iyengar d...
  • I Get It, but How Do I Change My Boss' Behavior?
    Often, when I'm working with emerging leaders or high potentials in an organization, I hear them say something like the following:  ...
  • Fewer Startups in Japan: Lessons for all Nations
    I'm here teaching in Tokyo for a week, as I have each July for the past decade.   Therefore, I thought it would be appropriate to offer ...
  • Curing CEO Disease
    The Wall Street Journal's Joann Lublin wrote a terrific column this week about "CEO disease."   Specifically, she writes about...
  • Are Network Effects Over-rated?
    Nir Eyal and Sangeet Paul Choudary have written an absolutely terrific column for TechCrunch about network effects.  The essay is titled, ...
  • The Protege Effect
    Fast Company's Drake Baer has a new column titled, "Why Teaching Makes You Smarter."   In the article, he draws upon a terrif...
  • Are People More Cooperative When They Make Speedy, Intuitive Choices?
    David Rand, Joshua Greene, and Martin Nowak have conducted a series of interesting new experiments that show a correlation between decisio...
  • The Dollar Shave Club: Look Out Gillette?
    The Wall Street Journal reports today about the rapid and surprising emergence of a new competitor to Gillette in the razor and blades busi...
  • Should Pepsi Divest Frito Lay?
    As many of my readers know, I am often skeptical of diversification strategies. I prefer focused firms that place their undivided attention...
  • The Power of Grit
    Paul Tough has written a thought-provoking new book titled, How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity, and the Hidden Power of Character .  Tou...

Categories

  • 3M (1)
  • AARs (1)
  • Abrashoff (1)
  • Accountability (2)
  • acquisitions (10)
  • activist investors (1)
  • admissions (1)
  • advertising (13)
  • advice (1)
  • after-action reviews (1)
  • aging (1)
  • airlines (1)
  • algorithms (2)
  • alignment (1)
  • altruism (1)
  • Amazon (9)
  • ambition (2)
  • American Airlines (1)
  • Amy's Baking Company (1)
  • analysis paralysis (1)
  • analytics (4)
  • Android (1)
  • Andy Kaufman (1)
  • Anheuser Busch Inbev (1)
  • animation (1)
  • anxiety (2)
  • apology (3)
  • apple (8)
  • apps (1)
  • Asch (1)
  • associational thinking (1)
  • Audi (1)
  • auteur (1)
  • authenticity (2)
  • auto industry (1)
  • Avon (1)
  • Baba Shiv (1)
  • bad news (2)
  • bailout (1)
  • bankruptcy (4)
  • Banks (1)
  • Barnes and Noble (1)
  • baseball (1)
  • beer (1)
  • beer industry (1)
  • Ben and Jerry's (1)
  • Bergdorf Goodman (1)
  • Berger (1)
  • Berkun (1)
  • Best Buy (2)
  • Bezos (2)
  • big data (4)
  • Black Friday (2)
  • blades (1)
  • BMW (1)
  • Boards (1)
  • boards of directors (4)
  • bonuses (1)
  • book (1)
  • books (1)
  • BOPS (1)
  • bourbon (1)
  • BP (2)
  • brain research (1)
  • brainstorming (9)
  • brainteasers (1)
  • brand (3)
  • brand dilution (2)
  • brand equity (3)
  • brand extensions (1)
  • branding (4)
  • brands (4)
  • break-up (3)
  • breakup value analysis (1)
  • Brené Brown (1)
  • Bryant University (1)
  • budget (1)
  • Budweiser (1)
  • Build-A-Bear (1)
  • Burger King (1)
  • business class (1)
  • business model (1)
  • business models (1)
  • business plans (1)
  • business school (1)
  • Cadillac (1)
  • CAFE (1)
  • Cain (1)
  • candid dialogue (1)
  • candy (1)
  • careers (3)
  • Carlyle (1)
  • Carnival (1)
  • cash cows (1)
  • cash flows (2)
  • celebrities (1)
  • CEO compensation (3)
  • CEOs (4)
  • Challenger (1)
  • change (3)
  • characters (1)
  • charisma (1)
  • cheating (1)
  • Chevron (1)
  • China (2)
  • chocolate (2)
  • choice (4)
  • Chris Stevens (1)
  • Christensen (2)
  • clutch (1)
  • co-founders (1)
  • coaching (2)
  • Coca-Cola (1)
  • coffee (1)
  • cognitive bias (5)
  • cognitive skills (1)
  • Coke (2)
  • collaboration (4)
  • college (4)
  • college athletics (1)
  • colleges (1)
  • Columbia (1)
  • commencement (1)
  • commencement speech (1)
  • communication (4)
  • compensation (9)
  • competency models (1)
  • competition (2)
  • competitive positioning (1)
  • competitiveness (1)
  • computers (1)
  • concerts (1)
  • conflict (4)
  • conflict management (1)
  • conformity (1)
  • conglomerate (1)
  • conglomerates (2)
  • consumer behavior (3)
  • continuous improvement (1)
  • controversy (1)
  • cooperation (1)
  • core business (1)
  • corporate governance (4)
  • corporate jets (1)
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
  • corporate strategy (1)
  • counterfactual thinking (1)
  • creativity (25)
  • crisis management (1)
  • critical ability (1)
  • CRM (1)
  • crowdsourcing (5)
  • cruise (1)
  • cultural differences (2)
  • culture (6)
  • customer experience (2)
  • customer satisfaction (2)
  • customer service (6)
  • Dan Heath (1)
  • Daniel Pink (1)
  • David Burkus (1)
  • debt (1)
  • deciision making (1)
  • decision making (17)
  • decision-making (15)
  • Deepwater Horizon (1)
  • deliberate practice (1)
  • Delta (1)
  • design (4)
  • design thinking (3)
  • devil's advocate (1)
  • Diapers.com (1)
  • directors (1)
  • dishonesty (1)
  • Disney (3)
  • disruptive technology (8)
  • dissent (4)
  • diversification (7)
  • divestiture (1)
  • dividends (1)
  • Dollar Shave Club (1)
  • doodling (1)
  • Dove (1)
  • Dr. Woody (1)
  • Ducati (1)
  • Duhigg (1)
  • earnings forecasts (1)
  • ecommerce (3)
  • economic growth (1)
  • economies of scale (5)
  • Edmondson (1)
  • education (3)
  • Eisenhower (1)
  • Eisner (1)
  • Electronic Arts (1)
  • email (1)
  • emerging markets (3)
  • emotions (1)
  • employee engagement (4)
  • employee recognition (1)
  • employees (1)
  • empowerment (1)
  • endorsements (1)
  • endowment effect (1)
  • Engagement (2)
  • entertainment (1)
  • entrepreneurship (11)
  • entrerpreneurship (1)
  • ESPN (3)
  • ethics (3)
  • ethnography (1)
  • Etsy (1)
  • European debt crisis (1)
  • Everest (2)
  • evolution (1)
  • execution (1)
  • exercise (1)
  • exit interviews (1)
  • experimentation (4)
  • expertise dissensus (1)
  • experts (1)
  • Facebook (5)
  • faculty (1)
  • Fadell (1)
  • failure (5)
  • Failures (3)
  • fair process (1)
  • Fastenal (1)
  • feedback (1)
  • female leaders (1)
  • filtering (1)
  • financial statements (1)
  • first mover advantage (1)
  • flattery (1)
  • flocking (1)
  • focus groups (1)
  • Ford (3)
  • freemium (2)
  • Friendly's (1)
  • fuel economy (1)
  • furniture (1)
  • Gallup (1)
  • game theory (3)
  • games (1)
  • gaming (1)
  • Gap (1)
  • gatekeepers (1)
  • GE (1)
  • gender bias (2)
  • gender differences (1)
  • Gillette (1)
  • Gilt Groupe (1)
  • global (1)
  • globalization (2)
  • GM (1)
  • goals (2)
  • Goodreads (1)
  • Google (6)
  • gossip (1)
  • governance (5)
  • graduates (1)
  • graphic facilitators (1)
  • Great Courses (2)
  • grit (1)
  • grocery (1)
  • ground rules (1)
  • group dynamics (9)
  • Groupon (1)
  • groups (4)
  • groupthink (3)
  • growth (3)
  • guilt (1)
  • Hackman (1)
  • Halvorson (1)
  • happiness (1)
  • Hasbro (1)
  • HBS (1)
  • health care (2)
  • Heath brothers (1)
  • Henry Stewart Talks (1)
  • heuristics (1)
  • hierarchy (2)
  • high achievers (1)
  • higher education (2)
  • Hilton (1)
  • hiring (6)
  • Home Depot (1)
  • Homeboy Industries (1)
  • Honda (1)
  • House of cards (1)
  • HP (4)
  • HR (1)
  • human resources (27)
  • Iams (2)
  • IBM (1)
  • ice cream (1)
  • IDEA (1)
  • IDEO (1)
  • Iger (1)
  • IKEA (1)
  • Improv (2)
  • inattentional blindness (1)
  • incentives (5)
  • India (1)
  • industrial policy (1)
  • industry structure (2)
  • inflation (1)
  • influence (1)
  • information overload (1)
  • Information sharing (2)
  • innovation (40)
  • Instagram (2)
  • insurance (1)
  • intellectual property (1)
  • international (1)
  • internet (2)
  • internet privacy (1)
  • interviews (6)
  • intrinsic motivation (1)
  • introverts (2)
  • Intuit (1)
  • intuition (1)
  • investors (2)
  • invisible gorilla (1)
  • IPO (3)
  • iPod (1)
  • IRS (1)
  • Isaacson (1)
  • Iyengar (1)
  • J.C. Penney (3)
  • Japan (5)
  • JC Penney (3)
  • JetBlue (1)
  • Jimmy Kimmel (1)
  • Job interviews (1)
  • job search (1)
  • Jobs (6)
  • Johnnie Walker (1)
  • joint ventures (1)
  • Jon Stewart (1)
  • Keith Sawyer (1)
  • Keurig (1)
  • Kindle (1)
  • Kodak (1)
  • Korea (1)
  • Kraft (1)
  • labor markets (1)
  • Lady Gaga (1)
  • Lafley (1)
  • Lampert (1)
  • LDRLB (1)
  • leadership (80)
  • leadership development (12)
  • leadership transitions (1)
  • lean startup (2)
  • learning (7)
  • Lego (1)
  • Lenovo (2)
  • lifetime value of a customer (1)
  • Lincoln (1)
  • Little Bets (1)
  • Loeb (1)
  • logistics (1)
  • lone genius (1)
  • Long Tail (1)
  • loss aversion (1)
  • LTV (1)
  • Lululemon (1)
  • Maker's Mark (1)
  • management by walking around (1)
  • manufacturing (1)
  • marginal cost (1)
  • market research (2)
  • market share (1)
  • marketing (22)
  • marketing research (1)
  • marketing to children (1)
  • Marriott (1)
  • Mattel (1)
  • MBWA (1)
  • McDonald (1)
  • McDonald's (1)
  • McKinsey (1)
  • media (2)
  • meetings (3)
  • Memorial Day (1)
  • mentorship (2)
  • mergers (4)
  • metrics (2)
  • Michael Porter (1)
  • Michigan Fish Test (1)
  • Microsoft (1)
  • Microsoft Surface (1)
  • military (1)
  • milkshake test (1)
  • millenials (1)
  • mission (1)
  • mistake (1)
  • mistakes (2)
  • mobile (2)
  • Monster (1)
  • Montgomery (1)
  • moral behavior (1)
  • moral standards (1)
  • motivation (7)
  • motorcycles (1)
  • Motorola (1)
  • movies (1)
  • Mulally (1)
  • Mullaly (1)
  • multinationals (1)
  • multitasking (1)
  • Murdoch (1)
  • music (1)
  • Myth of the Garage (1)
  • narcissism (3)
  • narratives (1)
  • NASA (2)
  • Navy (1)
  • NCAA (1)
  • negotiation (1)
  • negotiations (1)
  • Net Promoter Score (1)
  • NetFlix (7)
  • network effects (2)
  • neuroscience (1)
  • new groupthink (1)
  • New manager (1)
  • New product development (1)
  • News Corp (1)
  • NFL (1)
  • Nike (1)
  • noble profession (1)
  • Nokia (1)
  • non-compete agreements (1)
  • Nook (1)
  • Nordstrom (1)
  • Nutella (1)
  • observation (2)
  • off-price retail (1)
  • Office Depot (1)
  • office supplies (1)
  • OfficeMax (1)
  • oil (1)
  • oil industry (1)
  • oil spill (2)
  • Old Milwaukee (1)
  • Olympics (3)
  • online dating (1)
  • online marketplace (1)
  • online shopping (1)
  • Orbis (1)
  • Oreo (1)
  • organic growth (1)
  • organization structure (1)
  • organizational structure (2)
  • overconfidence (1)
  • packaging (1)
  • Paul Levy (1)
  • PC (1)
  • Pepsi (2)
  • performance evaluation (3)
  • peripheral knowledge (1)
  • personal brand (1)
  • personality (2)
  • personalization (1)
  • persuasion (2)
  • Piskorski (1)
  • Pixar (2)
  • Planet Fitness (1)
  • politics (1)
  • Postal Service (2)
  • power (2)
  • Power of Habit (1)
  • Powerpoint (1)
  • premium (1)
  • presentations (3)
  • prevention focus (1)
  • price (1)
  • pricing (6)
  • pricing strategy (1)
  • private equity (2)
  • private label (1)
  • problem finding (2)
  • problem solving (1)
  • problem-finding (2)
  • process losses (1)
  • processes (1)
  • Proctor and Gamble (6)
  • product design (1)
  • productivity (3)
  • professors (1)
  • project management (1)
  • promotion (1)
  • promotion focus (1)
  • promotions (1)
  • protege effect (2)
  • prototypes (2)
  • psychology (1)
  • public relations (3)
  • public speaking (4)
  • purpose (1)
  • quality (3)
  • questions (2)
  • Qwikster (3)
  • Rasmussen (1)
  • razors (1)
  • reality TV (1)
  • reasoning (1)
  • recessions (1)
  • recognition (2)
  • recommendations (1)
  • Red Cross (1)
  • Redbox (1)
  • reference checks (1)
  • reflection (1)
  • regulation (1)
  • reputation (1)
  • research (3)
  • Research and development (1)
  • resource allocation (1)
  • restaurants (1)
  • retail (29)
  • retailers (1)
  • retention (3)
  • reviews (1)
  • rewards (2)
  • Richard Branson (1)
  • risk (7)
  • risk-taking (2)
  • rock and roll (1)
  • Ron Johnson (1)
  • rules of thumb (1)
  • safety (2)
  • salary negotiations (1)
  • Saturday Night Live (2)
  • scandal (1)
  • scarcity (1)
  • Schulze (1)
  • search (1)
  • Sears (4)
  • SEC reporting (1)
  • See's Candies (1)
  • self-confidence (1)
  • self-control (1)
  • serendipity (1)
  • serotonin (1)
  • severance (1)
  • shame (1)
  • Sharknado (1)
  • shopping (1)
  • simulation (2)
  • Skanska (1)
  • Skechers (1)
  • small business (1)
  • small wins (1)
  • smartphones (2)
  • SNL (3)
  • Snooth (1)
  • Snowe (1)
  • social currency (1)
  • social enterprise (1)
  • social gaming (1)
  • social influence (2)
  • social media (14)
  • social networks (1)
  • soda (1)
  • solar power (1)
  • Solyndra (1)
  • Sony (1)
  • speaking up (2)
  • speed (1)
  • spinoff (1)
  • spinoffs (1)
  • sports radio (1)
  • Stand-up Economist (1)
  • Stanford (1)
  • Staples (2)
  • Starbucks (6)
  • start-ups (1)
  • startups (6)
  • status (3)
  • Steelcase (1)
  • Steve Jobs (2)
  • stock options (1)
  • stories (1)
  • storytelling (1)
  • strategic planning (1)
  • strategy (41)
  • stress (2)
  • substitutes (1)
  • succession (5)
  • supermarkets (1)
  • supply chain (1)
  • surveys (1)
  • Susan Cain (2)
  • switching costs (1)
  • synergies (2)
  • synergy (1)
  • talent (2)
  • talent management (9)
  • talent retention (1)
  • Target (3)
  • target market (1)
  • taste test (1)
  • teaching (3)
  • team dynamics (9)
  • team scaffolds (1)
  • teaming (1)
  • teams (24)
  • technology (2)
  • TED (2)
  • telecommuting (1)
  • television (1)
  • tennis (1)
  • test (1)
  • Thanksgiving (1)
  • The Daily Show (1)
  • Ticketmaster (1)
  • Time management (2)
  • Timothy Judge (1)
  • Tina Fey (1)
  • TJX (1)
  • top management teams (2)
  • Toyota (1)
  • toys (2)
  • tradeoffs (2)
  • transaction costs (1)
  • Triumph (1)
  • trust (1)
  • tuition (1)
  • tuition bubble (1)
  • turnaround (2)
  • turnover (1)
  • TV (2)
  • Twitter (5)
  • Tyco (1)
  • Uber (1)
  • Unbroken (1)
  • uncertainty (1)
  • Uniqlo (1)
  • universities (3)
  • university (1)
  • Unlocking the Truth (1)
  • unrelated diversification (1)
  • user-generated content (1)
  • USS Greeneville (1)
  • vacation (1)
  • valuation (1)
  • Values (2)
  • venture capital (1)
  • vertical integration (7)
  • video games (3)
  • Vine (1)
  • VIPs (1)
  • viral (1)
  • viral marketing (1)
  • Virgin Atlantic (1)
  • virtual teams (1)
  • vision (2)
  • volatility (1)
  • Vosques Haut-Chocolat (1)
  • wait times (1)
  • Wal-Mart (1)
  • Warren Buffett (2)
  • Washington Post (1)
  • Wharton (1)
  • Whitman (1)
  • Why Great Leaders Don't Take Yes For an Answer (2)
  • Will Ferrell (1)
  • wine (2)
  • wisdom of crowds (1)
  • work (2)
  • work ethic (1)
  • workspace (1)
  • Yahoo (1)
  • Yelp (1)
  • Yum Brands (2)
  • Zamperini (1)
  • Zuckerman (1)
  • Zynga (2)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (126)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ▼  2012 (219)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ▼  April (24)
      • Biased Samples Hike Executive Compensation
      • Is Telecommuting Effective or Not?
      • Teaming is a Verb!
      • What Every HR Exec Should be Doing
      • Does Exercise Make You More Intelligent?
      • Is Doodling Something to be Encouraged?
      • Why Humans Don't Excel at Multitasking
      • The Shops at Target
      • Do Older Entrepreneurs Have an Edge?
      • The Hottest Growth Stock of the Past 25 Years? Yo...
      • Long Term Thinking Does Exist in Corporate America!
      • Why Change is Hard
      • Facebook and Instagram: Where was the Board?
      • Audi to Acquire Ducati
      • Growth Lessons from Gilt Groupe Co-Founders
      • Separating Needs and Concepts: How to Develop Grea...
      • The Dollar Shave Club: Look Out Gillette?
      • Do Online Dating Sites Help Those Who Struggle Fin...
      • The Facebook-Instagram Deal
      • External vs. Internal Hires: The Pay-Performance Gap
      • Will Delta really save money by acquiring an oil r...
      • Can Burger King Be Saved?
      • Do You Want Your Peers to Set Your Bonus?
      • Gender Bias in Human Resource Processes: How to Ov...
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2011 (155)
    • ►  December (17)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile